Multimodalidade na aprendizagem de Biologia Celular: o uso de recursos audiovisuais e analogias como promotores de representações genuínas dos estudantes

Authors

  • Lucas Roberto Perucci Instituto Federal do Paraná - Campus Foz do Iguaçu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54343/reiec.v14i2.253

Keywords:

Cell Biology, Multimodality, Analogie, Semiology

Abstract

This article intends to discuss the utilization of multiple representations in Biology Cell learning. A proposal to address the subject of cell transport was developed from problem situations: salt intake and the increase of blood pressure and the absorption of glucose by the gut. The students were oriented to produce singular representations which were used to explain the phenomenon, with the creation of a narrated video, with imagens, animations and allowed to use analogies. Thus, we created a proposal where the use of consolidated representations in the literature was combined with the students´ own expressions, in order to collaborate with the understanding. For the data analysis, we use the categories from semiology, like the denotation, connotation, paradigm and syntagma, which allow us to compare the content in various ways. We concluded that there was engagement and sharing of genuine concepts by the students and innovating with unique representations due to the intense use of analogies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Lucas Roberto Perucci, Instituto Federal do Paraná - Campus Foz do Iguaçu

Sou licenciado e bacharel em Ciências Biológicas pela Universidade Estadual de Londrina. Fiz mestrado em Ensino de Ciências e Educação Matemática pela mesma instituição e atualmente, sou doutorando no mesmo programa.Sou Docente do Instituto Federal de Ciência e Tecnologia do Paraná.

References

Ainsworth, S., Prain, V., & Tytler, R. (2011). Drawing to Learn in Science. Science, 333(6046), 1096–1097. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1204153

Barthes, R. (2012). Elementos de Semiologia (19o ed). São Paulo: Cultrix.

Bezemer, J., & Kress, G. (2008). Writing in Multimodal Texts: A Social Semiotic Account of Designs for Learning. Written Communication, 25(2), 166–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088307313177

Coelho N, J. T. (2003) Semiótica, informação comunicação. (6 ed). São Paulo: Perspectiva.

Duit, R. (1991). On the role of analogies and metaphors in learning science. Science Education, 75(6), 649–672. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730750606

Duval, R. (1995) Sémiosis et pensée humaine: registres sémiotiques et apprentissages intellectuels. Berne:Peter Lang, 1995.

Eco, U. (2002). Tratado Geral de Semiótica (4o ed). São Paulo: Perspectiva.

Fang, Z. (2006) The language demands of science reading in middle school. International Journal of Science Education. 28(5), 491-520. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500339092

Ferraz, D. F., & Terrazzan, E. A. (2003). Uso espontâneo de analogias por professores de biologia e o uso sistematizado de analogias: Que relação? Ciência & Educação (Bauru), 9(2), 213–227. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516- 73132003000200005

Fredlund, T., Airey, J., & Linder, C. (2012). Exploring the role of physics representations: An illustrative example from students sharing knowledge about refraction. European Journal of Physics, 33(3), 657–666. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/33/3/657

Hand, B., McDermott, M., & Prain, V. (Orgs.). (2016). Using Multimodal Representations to Support Learning in the Science Classroom. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319- 16450-2

Hubber, P., & Tytler, R. (2013). Models And Learning Science. In 1: Vol. 1. Constructing representations to learn in science. Rotterdam: Sense Publ.

Kress, G., Jewitt, C., Ogborn, J., & Charalampos, T. (2001). Multimodal Teaching and Learning: The Rhetorics of the Science Classroom (1o ed). London: Continuum.

Kress, G. (2010) Multimodality - A social semiotic approach to contemporay communication. 1. ed. New York: Routledge.

Kress, G.; Leeuwen, T. V. (2006) Reading images the grammar of visual design. 2. ed. New York: Routlegde.

Leão, G. M. C., Padial, A. A., & Randi, M. A. F. (2018). Representações não linguísticas e jogos cooperativos como estratégia de ensino e aprendizagem da biologia celular. Investigações em Ensino de Ciências, 23(2), 406. https://doi.org/10.22600/1518-8795.ienci2018v23n2p406

Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, nd values. Norwood, N.J: Ablex Pub. Corp.

Lemke, J. L. (2001). Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspectives on science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 21.

Lowe, R. (1999). Extracting information from an animation during complex visual learning. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14(2), 225–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03172967

Lowe, R. K. (2003). Animation and learning: Selective processing of information in dynamic graphics. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 157–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00018-X

Paris, N. A., & Glynn, S. M. (2004). Elaborate analogies in science text: Tools for enhancing preservice teachers’ knowledge and attitudes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(3), 230–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361- 476X(03)00033-X

Penn, G. (2002). Análise semiótica de imagens paradas. In M. W. Bauer & G. Gaskell, Pesquisa qualitativa com texto, imagem e som. (2o ed). Petrópolis: Vozes.

Prain, V., & Tytler, R. (2013). Representing and learning science. In R. Tytler (Org.), Constructing representations to learn in science (1o ed). Rotterdam: Sense Publ.

Saussure, F. (2012). Curso de Linguística Geral (34o ed). São Paulo: Cultrix.

Schwonke, R., Berthold, K., & Renkl, A. (2009). How multiple external representations are used and how they can be made more useful. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23(9), 1227–1243. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1526

Treagust, D. F., & Duit, R. (2008). Conceptual change: A discussion of theoretical, methodological and practical challenges for science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3(2), 297–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-008-9090-4

Trevisan, M. D., & Carneiro, M. C. (2009). Uma descrição semiótica da metáfora no ensino de biologia: asserções sobre a célula animal (A description of the semiotic metaphor in biology teaching: Assertions about the animal cell). Investigações em Ensino de Ciências, 14(3), 18.

Tytler, R., Peterson, S., & Prain, V. (2005). Picturing evaporation: Learning science literacy through a particle representation. Teaching Science, the journal of Australian Science Teachers Association, 52(1), 12–17.

Tytler, R., Prain, V., & Peterson, S. (2007). Representational Issues in Students Learning About Evaporation. Research in Science Education, 37(3), 313– 331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9028-3

Tytler, R., Waldrip, B., & Griffiths, M. (2004). Windows into practice: Constructing effective science teaching and learning in a school change initiative. International Journal of Science Education, 26(2), 171–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000097370

Vigotski, L. S. Pensamento e Linguagem. 4. ed. Sâo Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2008.

Volóchinov, V. (2017). Marxismo e filosofia da linguagem (1o ed, Vol. 1). São Paulo: 34.

Waldrip, B., Prain, V., & Carolan, J. (2006). Learning Junior Secondary Science through Multi-Modal Representations. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 11(1), 87–107. REIEC Año 2019 Nro. 14 Mes Diciembre 78 pp. 64-78 Recepción:24/07/2019 Aceptación: 25/10/2019

Wilbers, J., & Duit, R. (2006). Post-Festum and Heuristic Analogies. In P. J. Aubusson, A. G. Harrison, & S. M. Ritchie (Orgs.), Metaphor and Analogy in Science Education (Vol. 30, p. 37–49). https://doi.org/10.1007/1- 4020-3830

Published

2019-12-18

Issue

Section

Articles