Institutional and epistemological conditions for a transition to the paradigm of questioning the world
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54343/reiec.v20iEspecial.514Resumo
This article examines the institutional and epistemological conditions for a transition from the paradigm of visiting works to the paradigm of questioning the world within educational institutions, particularly in secondary and tertiary education. Anchored in the Anthropological Theory of the Didactic, the analysis conceives paradigms as tacit social contracts that govern human activity and investigates how didactic systems evolve through changes in the relations between teachers, students, and knowledge. The discussion traces the historical development of successive variants of the first paradigm—centered on the study of pre-established works—toward the emergence of the second paradigm, characterized by collective inquiry into generating questions. Central to this transition are the notions of adidacticity, milieu, and definalization, which enable a shift from prescribed exercises to the genuine study of questions. Through examples such as study and research activities and study and research paths, the paper analyzes the dialectic of didactization and adidactization, the construction of the milieu, and the evolving topogenesis of teachers and students. The article concludes by identifying epistemological attitudes required of teachers and learners to engage in education as a process of questioning the world—problematizing, Herbartian, procognitive, exoteric, and encyclopedic—thereby redefining both the aims and the assessment of education in this emerging didactic paradigm.
Downloads
Referências
Brousseau, G. (2002). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics: Didactique des mathématiques, 1970–1990 (N. Balacheff, M. Cooper, R. Sutherland, & V. Warfield, Eds. & Trans.). Kluwer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47211-2.
Chevallard, Y. (1999). L’analyse des pratiques enseignantes en théorie anthropologique du didactique. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 19(2), 221–266.
Chevallard, Y. (2015). Teaching mathematics in tomorrow’s society: A case for an oncoming counter paradigm. In S. J. Cho (Ed.), Proceedings of the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 173–187). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12688-3_13
Chevallard, Y. (2019). Introducing the Anthropological Theory of the Didactic: An attempt at a principled approach. Hiroshima Journal of Mathematics Education, 12, 71–114. https://doi.org/10.24529/hjme.1205
Chevallard, Y. (with Bosch, M.). (2020). A short (and somewhat subjective) glossary of the ATD. In M. Bosch, Y. Chevallard, F. J. García, & J. Monaghan (Eds.), Working with the anthropological theory of the didactic in mathematics education: A comprehensive casebook (pp. xviii–xxxvii). Routledge.
Floor and ceiling functions. (2025, November 25). In Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Floor_and_ceiling_functions&oldid=1324011599
Geometric mean theorem. (2025, August 27). In Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Geometric_mean_theorem&oldid=1308136895
Jones, J. H. (2007, May 1). Notes on R0. https://web.stanford.edu/~jhj1/teachingdocs/Jones-on-R0.pdf
Ostermann, A., & Wanner, G. (2012). Geometry by its history. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29163-0
Power of a point. (2025, November 12). In Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Power_of_a_point&direction=prev&oldid=1311688696
Rousseau, J.-J. (1988). On social contract or principles of political right. In A. Ritter & J. C. Bondanella (Eds.), J. C. Bondanella (Trans.), Rousseau’s philosophical writings (pp. 84–173). Norton. (Original work published 1762)
Side splitter theorem. (n.d.). Math Warehouse. https://www.mathwarehouse.com/geometry/similar/triangles/side-splitter-theorem.php
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2025 Yves Chevallard, Heidi Strømskag

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Derechos de autor Revista Electrónica de Investigación en Educación en Ciencias
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
Todo el trabajo debe ser original e inédito. La presentación de un artículo para publicación implica que el autor ha dado su consentimiento para que el artículo se reproduzca en cualquier momento y en cualquier forma que la Revista Electrónica de Investigación en Educación en Ciencias considere apropiada. Los artículos son responsabilidad exclusiva de los autores y no necesariamente representan la opinión de la revista, ni de su editor. La recepción de un artículo no implicará ningún compromiso de la Revista Electrónica de Investigación en Educación en Ciencias para su publicación. Sin embargo, de ser aceptado los autores cederán sus derechos patrimoniales a la Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires para los fines pertinentes de reproducción, edición, distribución, exhibición y comunicación en Argentina y fuera de este país por medios impresos, electrónicos, CD ROM, Internet o cualquier otro medio conocido o por conocer. Los asuntos legales que puedan surgir luego de la publicación de los materiales en la revista son responsabilidad total de los autores. Cualquier artículo de esta revista se puede usar y citar siempre que se haga referencia a él correctamente.














