Institutional and epistemological conditions for a transition to the paradigm of questioning the world

Auteurs

  • Yves Chevallard
  • Heidi Strømskag

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.54343/reiec.v20iEspecial.514

Résumé

This article examines the institutional and epistemological conditions for a transition from the paradigm of visiting works to the paradigm of questioning the world within educational institutions, particularly in secondary and tertiary education. Anchored in the Anthropological Theory of the Didactic, the analysis conceives paradigms as tacit social contracts that govern human activity and investigates how didactic systems evolve through changes in the relations between teachers, students, and knowledge. The discussion traces the historical development of successive variants of the first paradigm—centered on the study of pre-established works—toward the emergence of the second paradigm, characterized by collective inquiry into generating questions. Central to this transition are the notions of adidacticity, milieu, and definalization, which enable a shift from prescribed exercises to the genuine study of questions. Through examples such as study and research activities and study and research paths, the paper analyzes the dialectic of didactization and adidactization, the construction of the milieu, and the evolving topogenesis of teachers and students. The article concludes by identifying epistemological attitudes required of teachers and learners to engage in education as a process of questioning the world—problematizing, Herbartian, procognitive, exoteric, and encyclopedic—thereby redefining both the aims and the assessment of education in this emerging didactic paradigm.

Téléchargements

Les données relatives au téléchargement ne sont pas encore disponibles.

Références

Brousseau, G. (2002). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics: Didactique des mathématiques, 1970–1990 (N. Balacheff, M. Cooper, R. Sutherland, & V. Warfield, Eds. & Trans.). Kluwer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47211-2.

Chevallard, Y. (1999). L’analyse des pratiques enseignantes en théorie anthropologique du didactique. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 19(2), 221–266.

Chevallard, Y. (2015). Teaching mathematics in tomorrow’s society: A case for an oncoming counter paradigm. In S. J. Cho (Ed.), Proceedings of the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 173–187). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12688-3_13

Chevallard, Y. (2019). Introducing the Anthropological Theory of the Didactic: An attempt at a principled approach. Hiroshima Journal of Mathematics Education, 12, 71–114. https://doi.org/10.24529/hjme.1205

Chevallard, Y. (with Bosch, M.). (2020). A short (and somewhat subjective) glossary of the ATD. In M. Bosch, Y. Chevallard, F. J. García, & J. Monaghan (Eds.), Working with the anthropological theory of the didactic in mathematics education: A comprehensive casebook (pp. xviii–xxxvii). Routledge.

Floor and ceiling functions. (2025, November 25). In Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Floor_and_ceiling_functions&oldid=1324011599

Geometric mean theorem. (2025, August 27). In Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Geometric_mean_theorem&oldid=1308136895

Jones, J. H. (2007, May 1). Notes on R0. https://web.stanford.edu/~jhj1/teachingdocs/Jones-on-R0.pdf

Ostermann, A., & Wanner, G. (2012). Geometry by its history. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29163-0

Power of a point. (2025, November 12). In Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Power_of_a_point&direction=prev&oldid=1311688696

Rousseau, J.-J. (1988). On social contract or principles of political right. In A. Ritter & J. C. Bondanella (Eds.), J. C. Bondanella (Trans.), Rousseau’s philosophical writings (pp. 84–173). Norton. (Original work published 1762)

Side splitter theorem. (n.d.). Math Warehouse. https://www.mathwarehouse.com/geometry/similar/triangles/side-splitter-theorem.php

Téléchargements

Publiée

2025-12-23

Numéro

Rubrique

Des articles